 |
~ Maniac's Library |
|
No Man On The Moon Is that the moon or a studio in the Nevada desert? How can the flag flutter when there's no wind on the moon? Why can't we see stars in the moon-landing pictures? For three decades, NASA has taken the high road, ignoring those who claimed the Apollo moon landings were faked and part of a collosal United States government conspiracy. The claims and suspicious questions like the ones cited here mostly showed up in books and on the Internet. But last year's prime-time Fox TV special on the so-called "moon hoax" prompted schoolteachers and others to plead with NASA for factual ammunition to fight back. So a few months ago, the space agency budgeted US$ 15,000 to hire a former rocket scientist and author to produce a small book refuting the disbelievers' claims. It would be written primarily with teachers andstudents in mind. The idea backfired, however, embarrasing the space agency for responding to ignorance, and the book deal was chucked. "The issue of trying to do a targeted response to this is just lending credibility to something that is, on its face, asinine," NASA chief Sean O'Keefe said in late November after the dust settled. So it's back to square one - ignoring the hoaxers. That's troubling to some scientific experts who contend that someone needs to lead the fight against scientific illiteracy and the growing belief in pseudoscience like aliensand astrology. Someone like NASA. "If they don't speak out, who will?" asks Melissa Pollak, a senior analyst at the US National Science Foundation. Author James Oberg will. The former space shuttle flight controller plans to write the book NASA commissioned from him even though the agency pulled the plug. He's seeking money elsewhere. His working title: A Pall Over Apollo. Tom
Hanks will speak out, too. The Academy Award-winning actor, who
starred in the 1995 movie Apollo 13 in November, Hanks said
the film industry has a responsibility to promote historical literacy.
He took a jab at the 1987 movie Capricorn One, which had NASA's
first manned mission to Mars being faked on a sound stage. "We live in a society where there is no law in making money in the promulgation of ignorance or, in some cases, stupidity," Hanks said. "There are a lot of things you can say never happened. You can go as relatively quassi-harmless as saying no one went to the moon. But you also can say that the Holocaust never happened." "Television's Fox Network was the moon-hoax purveyor. In February 2001 and again a month later, Fox broadcast an hour-long programme tittle Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? Roger Launius, who agreed to Oberg's book just before leaving NASA's history office, says the story about the moon hoax has been around a long time. But the Fox sho "raised it to a new level, it gave it legs and credibility that it didn't have before:. Indeed, the National Science Foundations Pollak says two of her colleaques, after watching the Fox special, thought it was possible that NASA faked the moon landings. "These are people who work at NSF," she stresses. The story went - and still goes - something like this: America was desperate to beat the Soviet Union in the high-stakes race to the moon, but lacked the technology to pull it off. So NASA faked the six manned moon landings in a studio somewhere out West. Ralph Rene, a retired carpenter in New Jersey, takes it one step farther. The space fakery started during the Gemini programme, according to Rene, author of the 1992 book, NASA Mooned America! "I don't know what real achievements they have done because when do you trust a liar?" Rene says. "I know we have a shuttle running right above our heads, but that's only 175 miles (282km) up. It's under the shield. You cannot go through the shield and live." He's talking, of course, about the radiation shield. Alex Roland, a NASA historian during the 1970s and early 1980s, says his office used to have "a kook drawer" for such correspondence and never took it very seriously. But there were no prime-time TV shows disputing the moon landings then - and no Internet. Still, Roland would be inclined to "just let it go because you'll probably just make it worse by giving it attention". Within NASA, opinions were split about a rebuttal book. Oberg, a Houston-based author of 12 books, mostly about the Russian space programme, said ignoring the problem "just makes this harder. To a conspiracy mind, refusing to respond is a sign of cover up". Phil Plait, a Sonoma State University astronomer who picks apart the moon hoaxers' claims on his Bad Astronomy website, agrees that NASA should have followed through with the book but understands why it didn't. "It became, as things like this do, a media circus. And by circus, I mean more like carnival," Plait says. He warns: "There's a lot of anti-scientific thinking and if this stuff is allowed to continue, it's going to spell doom for our country." Apollo 13 commander Jim Lovell does not know what else, if anything, can be done to confront this moon madness. "All I know is that somebody sued me because I said I went to the moon," says the 74-year-old astronaut. "Of course, the courts threw it out." The authorities also threw out the case involving Apollo 11 moonwalker Aldrin in September. A much bigger and younger man was hounding the 72-year-old astronaut in Beverly Hills, California, calling him "a coward and a liar and a thief" and trying to get him to swear on a Bible, on camera, that he walked on the moon. Aldrin, a Korean War combat pilot, responded with a fist in the chops. Compare this with the gentle disbelievers of yesteryear. For its last manned moon shot 30 years ago this month, NASA invited Charlie Smith, a former slave reputed to be 130 years old. Smith was impressed by the nighttime lift-off of Apollo 17, but said afterward he still did not believe the astronauts were flying to the moon. "It just can't happen," he insisted. Ron
Howard's grandfather also did not believe men went to the moon.
Howard grew up to become the director of Apollo 13.
|
||
